Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Steve Langasek: > > > > Please escalate this to the DPL and/or SPI. He certainly doesn't have a > > > > legal right to use that logo, [...] > > I agree with Steve that the "Debian Official Use Logo" is used in a way > that is not allowed by the license published at > http://www.debian.org/logos/ .
Please can someone explain to me how this use of the official logo doesn't satisfy the licence? It seems to be used to promote sales of official CDs which are clearly labelled which parts are official. Is the complaint that the logo is positioned in a confusing way (by the menu rather than right next to the relevant product descriptions), or that the CDs aren't really official CDs, or something else? [Cc dropped. Returning to this thread after it hit spi-trademark, where I asked a similar question of the reporter.] Puzzled, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
