Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I think this would require a package name change. Any other opinion
> on that?
That is what it looks like to me. Also, this clause
2. Altered versions must be clearly and explicitly marked as such,
and must not be misrepresented as being the original software.
Significantly altered versions may not be distributed (neither
in source nor binary form), by a name that could be confused
with a name of this software ("ion", "ion3", etc.), without
additional very explicit component that indicates that the
version is non-standard.
means you should call it something like "ion-debian-patched", just to
avoid conflict if there is a difference of opinion on what
"significant" means.
Cheers,
Walter Landry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
