-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: > I agree that the GPLv3 is not "compatible" with the OpenSSL license, in the > sense that code licensed under the OpenSSL license cannot be included in a > GPLv3 work. However, the GPLv3 does include a broader (if no more easily > understood) system exception clause, which seems to allow distributing GPLv3 > binaries that are /dynamically linked/ against OpenSSL. Is this not the > position of FSF/FSF Europe?
I am discussing this in detail with Brett Smith of FSF. Kern Sibbald wrote: > OK, I think the possible solutions are pretty clear to me. Thank you for the > rapid response. No problem. Kern, if it would be useful to you I can arrange a physical meeting or telephone call to discuss these things in more detail. After all, we are only a few kilometres from each other in Switzerland and we might be able to explore options more quickly that way. Regards Shane - -- Shane Coughlan FTF Coordinator Free Software Foundation Europe Office: +41435000366 ext 408 / Mobile: +41792633406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support Free Software > http://fsfe.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBRpkLutGa7CzA5hXyAQKT5AQAnm8Rf+mzyNtRf29/zhrT/PNQ5agRlJyn zN7LGecsMiFlCfEPI/0OAeu4Y4rE56QnFiJJQjEp4gUw7ybKeNFzCguLegBIUyoi HME3kurobaAgBKA1Bt6dZClE4N1bQ3u9sVmhH9QjWL+HU4ldoLtI6OduqBDNUyin H3OOojb1/Jw= =qI0F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]