Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is clearly absurd to say that a work written a year (or five > years) ago depends on a GPLv3-licensed version of emacs; there was > no such thing when the older work was written.
Note also that twisting one's definition of "derived" such that this could be interpreted to be the case is of no use. It's the copyright-law sense of "derived work" that rules here, no whether semantic contortions can make time-bending derivations conceivable. -- \ "Somebody told me how frightening it was how much topsoil we | `\ are losing each year, but I told that story around the campfire | _o__) and nobody got scared." -- Jack Handey | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
