"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It has already been made clear that you're not required to > distribute the modified source on the same network connection as the > remote interaction.
Has it? I haven't seen how anything but "convey the corresponding source at the same time and from the same server as the interactive interface" can guarantee to satisfy AGPLv3 §13. I've seen many *assertions* that copyright holders probably won't insist that the AGPLv3 §13 be followed. I don't see how that argues that the terms make a work free. > That those debating against the AGPLv3 on this thread Again, arguing "for" or "against" the AGPLv3 is irrelevant here. The question being asked in this discussion is: Is a work DFSG-free if it is licensed under the terms of the AGPLv3, with its terms *as is* and not with some of them handwaved away to assume a generous copyright holder. > What we care about is having the source code available and that all > users are made aware of it's availability. This is laudable, and indeed a necessary part of the work being free software. Can we please move past this to the remaining questions of whether *all* the terms of the AGPLv3, applied as-is to a work, make that work free or non-free under *all* the guidelines of the DFSG. -- \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “Well, I think | `\ so, Brain, but do I really need two tongues?” —_Pinky and The | _o__) Brain_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
