Francesco Poli <f...@firenze.linux.it> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:57:49 +0000 MJ Ray wrote: > [...] > > I found gnapplet with sources in the contrib bit of the gammu tree. > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gammu;ver=1.23.1-2;arch=i386;stamp=1236036416 > > doesn't seem to mention it being rebuilt. > > Can it not be rebuilt from those sources alone? [...] > > It seems to me that bug #521448 is an attempt to report this [...] > I am not sure whether the bug should be reopened or maybe another bug > report should be filed against gammu. > What do others think?
Reopen and retitle? As I understand policy 2.2.2, the gammu applet is almost exactly the example of "free packages which require [...] packages which are not in our archive at all for compilation or execution" at the moment. Minor but essential. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org