Hi Anthony, On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:42:33PM +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > Each author *should*, as a matter of *courtesy*, explicitly mention the > licence in all of their files,
Yes, I agree, in general, but it's still not clear to me that section 12 of LGPL can't be interpreted as "you can put a single GPL header" just like "2 or later" in a GPLv2+ header can be interpreted as "you can update the version number and use a single header". What would be the difference? > and *should* *not* use a different > licence when modifying a different author's original files. That depends on whether the original author chose license terms that would allow this. In this case they did. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
