Marco d'Itri wrote: > nicolas.alva...@gmail.com wrote: > >>How about we try this? Let's assume for a moment that choice-of-venue is >>both acceptable and allowed by the DFSG. Then look at the *rest* of the >>cal.h license terms instead of continuing the argument about this one. > > As explained, the license does not really matter since function > definitions usually are not subject to copyright.
[function definitions are the actual code, so I'll assume you meant declarations] When was that said? I couldn't find anyone in this thread saying declarations aren't subject to copyright. -- Nicolas (I read mailing lists through Gmane. Please don't Cc me on replies; it makes me get one message on my newsreader and another on email.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
