Nicolas Alvarez <nicolas.alva...@gmail.com> wrote: > MJ Ray wrote: > > I'm not convinced that there is consensus on choice-of-venue being > > acceptable. I suspect there's a mix of considering it acceptable, > > thinking we can fight it when needed and ignorance. > > This choice-of-venue discussion looks like it won't get consensus soon, and > it is getting us away from the original thread topic. > > How about we try this? Let's assume for a moment that choice-of-venue is > both acceptable and allowed by the DFSG. Then look at the *rest* of the > cal.h license terms instead of continuing the argument about this one.
I agree that one failure makes it fail to follow the DFSG, but if someone's going to contact AMD, it seems worth addressing all problems and not let things like choice-of-venue get dismissed because they're usually merely controversial rather than clear-cut REJECT reasons. Given the number of problems and possible problems, requesting a switch to something Expat-like seems a good option to me. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
