On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Dmitry Nezhevenko <d...@inhex.net> wrote: > > Upstream distributes in both "source" and "minimized" forms: > > http://masonry.desandro.com/jquery.masonry.min.js > https://github.com/desandro/masonry/blob/master/jquery.masonry.js > > How this particular file should be handled? The only idea I've is to > remove this file in my get-git-snapshot-source step and download "right" > one instead.
I don't see anything wrong with either file. It's under an MIT (i.e.; free) license and it's human readable source code. It's not even "obfuscated" -- it's just missing whitespace. I ran the "obfuscated" version through JSBeautifier[1] and got something that looks like the "non-obfuscated" version[2]. [1] http://jsbeautifier.org/ [2] http://paste.debian.net/165689/ While it may be ugly, it's certainly easy to clean up. I don't know if there are any pretty printers in Debian for JavaScript but someone with a text editor can easily re-insert the whitespace without too much trouble. How does this "obfuscation" (I use quotes because I don't believe it's obfuscated) prevent its inclusion in Debian directly? Why does special consideration need to be made for this file? -- Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caoevnyt2s-be64xfi0-4kue2pat14f7yrdmdj1hxfd6ybg9...@mail.gmail.com
