debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Public domain and DSFGness Landry, Walter
• To Debian-legal Juelz
• Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Vincent Bernat
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Simon McVittie
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Francesco Poli
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Paul Wise
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Francesco Poli
  • Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Paul Wise
• Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jonathan Xu
  • Re: Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
  • Re: Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jonathan Xu
  • Re: Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jonathan Xu
• Sistemas de encadernação à sua escolha SUPRIMAX
• NoViDaDe para facilitar nas embalagens - Refiladora com dispensador SUPRIMAX
• EMI shielded mesh-foil windows Holland Shielding Systems BV
• Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Moritz Schlarb
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Ian Jackson
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Ian Jackson
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Andres Salomon
  • Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
• Animation videos for your next promotion Paul Joseph
• Report Copy of Debian Logo Ryan Hemsley
  • Re: Report Copy of Debian Logo Francesco Poli
• license compatibility Moshe Piekarski
  • Re: license compatibility Ben Finney
  • Re: license compatibility debian . mailinglists
  • Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package (was: license compatibility) Ben Finney
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Ben Finney
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Ben Finney
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Paul Wise
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Ian Jackson
  • Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
• Free Software Guidelines Question Wade Pinkston
  • Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Paul Wise
  • Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Giovanni Mascellani
  • Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Francesco Poli
• Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
  • Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License Florian Weimer
  • Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
  • Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License Florian Weimer
  • Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
  • Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License Florian Weimer
  • Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
• Re: Is screenshots.debian.net at risk? Johannes Schauer
• GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
  • Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Florian Weimer
  • Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
  • Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
• Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies Christoph Berg
• FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Andrej Shadura
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Don Armstrong
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Don Armstrong
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Don Armstrong
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giovanni Mascellani
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Thorsten Alteholz
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Vincent Bernat
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Lamparter
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL David Lamparter
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL Paul Wise
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Roberto
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Roberto
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Andrew
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ansgar Burchardt
  • Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Julian Andres Klode
  • Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ansgar
  • Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
  • Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Steve Langasek
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Christian Kastner
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Eloi
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Lamparter
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
  • Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Florian Weimer
  • no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Florian Weimer
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Andrej Shadura
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giovanni Mascellani
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Christian Kastner
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
• do I need to mention tiny change in copyright file Joël Krähemann
  • Re: do I need to mention tiny change in copyright file Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: do I need to mention tiny change in copyright file Joël Krähemann
• EUPL (v1.2) and OpenSSL Peter Wienemann
  • Re: EUPL (v1.2) and OpenSSL Peter Wienemann
• Enjoy the health benefits of safe, scalar light healing for your entire family admin2
• Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 أحمد المحمودي
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Ben Finney
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Ben Finney
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Christian Kastner
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Christian Kastner
  • Is an English license mandatory in Debian? (was: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2) Giacomo Tesio
  • Re: Is an English license mandatory in Debian? (was: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2) Christian Kastner
  • Re: Is an English license mandatory in Debian? (was: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2) Christian Kastner
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Landry, Walter
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 أحمد المحمودي
  • Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Landry, Walter
• redistribution of the ARIN TAL Marco d'Itri
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Marco d'Itri
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Ben Finney
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Landry, Walter
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Florian Weimer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages