# debian-legal@lists.debian.org is CCed. Sorry to be late.
I would like to tell you the background of my last post. I was wondering why Free Software Definition was not sufficient for Debian Project. I thought this was permissive enough for the project. Once on twitter, I said that GNU's definition was more permissive than The Open Source Definition. But one of my followers replied that he did not think so. I could not understand what he meant, and I could not prove what I said. Then, I posted <20120531104258.ga31...@a.19290.net>. After reading your words, now I think The Free Software Definition is really permissive, but this very *permissiveness* made GNU's definition insufficient for Debian Project. Am I right? -- Hiroki Horiuchi from Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120608015848.ga27...@a.19290.net
