-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello Forum:
On 12/03/16 03:39, Ben Finney wrote: > Jerome BENOIT <calcu...@rezozer.net> writes: > >> On 11/03/16 21:15, Riley Baird wrote: >>> That licence is fine. >>> >> So now step forward in peace. > > Before achieving peace, please see the rest of the thread in > ‘debian-legal’; I disagree with Riley's assessment. > Please let me know if would be good idea to contact the upstream team to clarify their Copyright. According to you, which classical (and DFSG-conformant) copyright may fulfil their wish ? Thanks, Jerome -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW45r6AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj/osH/juJMFvvWmIP2i0gJ4hdiKdV T97Groav7cinXTkyHYPVmBf7YYrOU8c1u1i15cdq4mhNy+LQTi+rEf9pQfJOp8C8 vZpMW8KgUcD500dpUUZXdrR7wD27b3LJsy0KCiOKexK/LKrPf1zlXpu0ZufQSazT iMW3XRH4vOt2wSFdOYrSVMTFzWaOLV7pmkqCfxwv3bIS1tONz3HaXeBujppi+RKc Rt5eAD8EKfkEoPn1VQsQ+FSjgm95F4VMlTmMqBzg1sSFYgLyUVXIuYthapSn0s8w o1+4hB6JWS70b/8aPxHg6lm7mGUASTCqwpuMw03+e+bU+F5YG45V91QZ5DVijs0= =I026 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----