2016. febr. 22. 20:12 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" <tyr...@gmail.com>):
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> I see that there is no answer for Q4 in your forwarded mail, was that
originally not answered or just lost somewhere when forwarding?
> My understanding on the first look is that the PHP license is flawed
(tries to limit the usage of php in naming but that is a futile attempt
without registering a trademark) but the debian project shouldn't get into
any legal trouble from distributing software licensed via the php license
and even less likely when distributing software coming from the sources
listed on http://www.php.net/software/
>
> Is there anything else I'm missing which would make debian distributing
pear/pecl.php.net packages problematic based on this legal advice?
Bump. (Sorry for the top posting in my previous mail)
