On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:10:11AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Emilio probably meant that the choices were: > > - delay the buster update to do a bunch of toolchain updates (could take > quite a long time) > - grab the latest 102.x.x from git, which wouldn't be quite as quick as > a normal update for us (since the unstable packaging work wouldn't > have been done on it, as the maintainer already moved to the next > version), but is still much quicker than waiting on the toolchain > stuff
That certainly makes sense, thanks! I had not been keeping an eye on the ESR timetable, so didn't realize we were hitting the switchover just yet. - Chris