Hi. On 18/07/26 08:49 AM, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > On 17/07/2026 22:21, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > > Now that ruby3.1 is LTS only can we take care of this PU > > It was rejected as too risky by the SRM (and me). > > What reasons would we have to be laxer for LTS?
Sorry, I was reading in reverse thread. I wasn't aware this was happening* or may be forgot about this. Thanks. --abhijith
