Hi,
On 18/07/2026 12:06, Abhijith PA wrote:
On 18/07/26 08:49 AM, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
On 17/07/2026 22:21, Bastien Roucaries wrote:
Now that ruby3.1 is LTS only can we take care of this PU
It was rejected as too risky by the SRM (and me).
What reasons would we have to be laxer for LTS?
Sorry, I was reading in reverse thread. I wasn't aware this was
happening* or may be forgot about this.
In any case it's already in data/dla-needed.txt :) Point is, I'd
recommend we keep backporting patches rather than bumping upstream for a
base programming language running tons of private applications we can't
test.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103854#36
Cheers!
Sylvain
