On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:43:25PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> We should decide over time what it means for us to see "Ensembl run".
> The current definition for our package seems to be "use the public data
> of Ensembl but have a local user management". This makes some very
> decent sense for anyone interested in learning or extending the
> functionality of Ensembl from day one. And with so many other
> bioinformatics and statistical tools available in Debian, there is
> plenty of opportunity for everyone to investigate so many different things.
While I agree with you that there are a plenty of different use cases it
was always good style in Debian to provide a "pure use" package and a
"development" package in addition. For the moment I would concentrate
on the first part. Considering the fact that we do not have bsub in
Debian anyway the script in question does not (yet) qualify for any of
these flowers.
> Good you are around. Many thanks and regards,
Yes, definitely.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111208210724.gc20...@an3as.eu
