Hi Stephen, On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:38:44PM -0400, Stephen Smith wrote: > I would be happy to take a look at the copyright contents. However, I am > a bit new to this so not exactly sure which bits are missing. Not trying > to be dense, just not sure.
The fact that Thorsten was talking about jebl might give (also me ... I overlooked this as well) a hint: You should mention third party software with their copyright as well. It seems Thorsten had a section Files: src/jebl/* in mind. > Maybe Andreas or you could point me in the > right direction and I can fix things. Aha, the copyright needs the jebl > authors as well I am guessing? Yes. May be there is other third party code included? > As for jebl being a separate package, it is a bit complicated. The original > one is no longer maintained (http://sourceforge.net/projects/jebl/) though > this older one is the one that is included in phyutility. Seems like those > sources aren't even available anymore. There is an updated > (https://code.google.com/p/jebl2/) one, but this is not the one used by > phyutility. Perhaps you might be able to shed some light into something which is also unclear to me (as the Uploader of jebl2). The jebl* library is used in some phylogeny related projects and I have picked the last maintained version. I hope(!) that it is this version which is used by all its rdependant packages: $ apt-cache rdepends libjebl2-java | grep -v med-bio libjebl2-java Reverse Depends: beast-mcmc spread-phy figtree I think I talked to the authors of these packages before to be sure but I do not exactly remember. At least the packages are building without problems against this library and from a quick look are working (and no bug reports so far but this is not a sure sign for low popcon software). > So from phyutility's perspective, I am not sure it would be > helpful to have jebl2 as a package. Again, new to this, so happy to do > whatever is best. Again repearing that I have no idea about jebl / jebl2: Could you imagine using jebl2 because this *is* maintained? Or are you continue maintaining this jebl code in phyutility. I'm just a bit suspicious since I personally would try to follow the maintained code (if possible) rather than conserving old code. It would be great if you would share your reasons. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140317075245.gc10...@an3as.eu