Hi Thorsten, On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:37:38AM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > >As for jebl being a separate package, it is a bit complicated. The original > >one is no longer maintained (http://sourceforge.net/projects/jebl/) though > >this older one is the one that is included in phyutility. Seems like those > >sources aren't even available anymore. There is an updated > >(https://code.google.com/p/jebl2/) one, but this is not the one used by > >phyutility. > > Oh, thats the answer I didn't expect. As there is a dependency on > libjebl2-java in debian/control I thought that your version of jebl > is just unused and could be removed from the source tarball (not the > original one but the one included in Debian).
I guess the Build-Dependency of libjebl2-java was injected by me years ago and probably based on the wrong assumption that jebl2 would be a plug-in replacement for jebl. I do not remember really but I think when doing so I was trying to replace a prebuilded jebl.jar binary. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140317111838.gg10...@an3as.eu