On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:23:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 08:59:57AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote (in another > mail which I merged in here): > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/conda > > I think indeed it is a good catch, but I wonder if it should be in > > med-team. Should not it rather be in python team? > > I do not mind about what team the package is in. We have several > packages in Debian Med that also could be there. My main motivation is > that I'm observing issues in Debian Med really close and issues on > packages in other teams might slip through my attention. If I could be > sure that somebody else in Python team would feel responsible for the > package that would be fine. If not - I'd prefer to keep it where it is > now. > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:12:16AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > > > >> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/conda > > > > I think also that there will be a need of additional patch (no idea yet > > where the issue is in code) to disable auto-update. > > > > Frequently, on conda package update, it checks and propose to update > > conda. If it is installed via debian package, it should not self update > > from conda web site. > > Sure, conda packaged for Debian should run self updates.
s/should/should NOT/ -- http://fam-tille.de
