Hi Aaron,

Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-10-05 08:57:43 -0400:
> u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> 
> > issue a give-back request for python-biopython on mipsel once a suitable
> > new BLAST+ build is available there.
> 
> Update: The new BLAST+ build showed up overnight (from my time zone,
> anyway) as expected, and python-biopython's mipsel status changed from
> "Failed" without my intervention.  However, it is currently stuck in
> "BD-Uninstallable" per a new ghostscript FTBFS bug [1], which I presume
> somebody will fix soon.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971678

Many, many thanks for your swift update.  I'm reverting most of
my changes to python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3 packaging to make
sure no overrides risk interferring with your tuning during the
build or autopkgtest, and bump the requirements to ncbi-blast+
2.10.1-3.

My understanding is that it is now urgent to wait for
ghostscript to be available again before further upload/rebuild
attempt I guess.

Have a nice day  :)
-- 
Étienne Mollier <etienne.moll...@mailoo.org>
Old rsa/3072: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54  2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d
New rsa/4096: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to