Thanks for your interest! On 07/24/2016 11:13 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > I want to review this package more throughly, but I'm a bit confused by > your git repository. You have a branch `debian/sid` which is tagged > `0.4.0-3` but your master branch contains some additional commits. > > If I want to review from git rather than download from mentors, where > should I look? The master branch or the debian/sid branch? I recently switched from developing on the debian/sid branch to the master branch (hence the latter one has more recent commits). gbp by default assumes the build branch is 'master' (except specified via --git-debian-branch). Since I do not yet have a lot of experience with gbp, I am uncertain which work flow is better. (Any recommendations?)
For the most recent version of my work, please use the master branch, however the version on mentors is still based off the tag 0.4.0-3 on debian/sid branch. (Sorry for this 'mess'. Michael Stapelberg has just requested colab-maint access for me and then things should hopefully be cleaned up.)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
