On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 10:45:09AM +0100, GCS wrote: > Is it adviceable to take over libghttp? It seems the only one package > needs it is libhttp-ghttp-perl and also orphaned. IMHO it would be > better to remove them: gnome-vfs replaces libghttp and perl has other > bindings to http usage.
A number of packages use it; telegnome, which I maintain, is one. telegnome is dead upstream AFAIK (making it a major effort to port to gnome-vfs) but it's still useful and I don't know of any alternatives providing the same functionality. I may take over libghttp1 after Christmas if I find that I have some spare time. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
