Simon, Maytham, *ahum*
On 2026-11-08 20:09:45, Simon Quigley wrote:
There's also another argument to be made about the age of the bugs. It would be one thing if there was a recommendation not to sponsor from one DD and another DD did it anyway. On the other hand, for these bugs, *none* of the DDs interested in sponsoring packages have picked them up, recommendation against or not. That should speak for something. I'm absolutely +1 on closing the bugs that are older than a few months at this point, if they match the criteria of self-authored. The downside to automatically closing those old bugs is that we might actually miss a valid one, so should be handled manually.
As someone whose RFS is several months old by now, who has actively sought reviewers, gotten reviews, implemented reviewer comments and is currently ~1 month waiting for a potential sponsor feedback after 2 months with no sponsors, I'd very much appreciate if you took the time to manually close RFS issues to see which ones have had the uploader put serious effort in. Kind regards Lars
