On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:34:07PM +0100, Peter van Rossum wrote: > > Yes, of course, and that is what I did. But the actual question was: > how do I get dpkg-buildpackage to give the potato version a different > *name*? Just renaming the files gives problems with the signature on > the .changes/.dsc files. With the changelog entry? Make one for potato and one for woody. the potato version get something with potao in the version number, the woody get a higher version number, without potato. Happens all the time, look in potato-proposed-upgrades. Christian -- http://people.debian.org/~cts/
- building binary-only package with different name? Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Julian Gilbey
- Re: building binary-only package with diffe... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only package with d... Brian Russo
- Re: building binary-only package wi... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only packa... Christian T. Steigies
- Re: building binary-only p... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only packa... Ove Kaaven
- Re: building binary-only p... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-on... Ove Kaaven
- Re: building binary-only p... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: building binary-on... Steve Langasek
- Re: building binary-on... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: building binary-only packa... Steve Langasek