What I do is edit the last version in the debian/changelog, e.g. gri (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low to: gri (2.6.0-0potato1) unstable; urgency=low
Ove Kaaven wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Peter van Rossum wrote: > > > Yes, of course, and that is what I did. But the actual question was: > > how do I get dpkg-buildpackage to give the potato version a different > > *name*? Just renaming the files gives problems with the signature on > > the .changes/.dsc files. > > If you're just going to put these on the webpage, why would you even need > the .changes file? (And the .dsc is only for the source package, so you > don't need that for the potato build either) > > I'd put the potato and woody build in different directories, then I > wouldn't need to rename, but if you don't want to, I don't see why you > can't rename the potato build and drop the .changes file. In fact, make _sure_ you don't allow access to a signed .changes file on an unofficial web page because that would allow anybody to upload it to Debian. It's signed after all. Peter