Marc Haber wrote: > This is the way to do it for an init script. Is it OK to have a file > in /etc/default that does not provider defaults for an init script > but for an executeable called by users?
I don't know. I don't see a lot of advantage over just putting the conffile in /etc. There is something to be said for leaving /etc/default/ only for init scripts. Of course, "default" is perhaps not the best name for it if it only holds init script configs. -- see shy jo