Hi, I'm wondering how to interpret, especially the last part.
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=tetex-bin First it says: * Updating tetex-bin makes 3 depending packages uninstallable on alpha: jbibtex-bin, jmpost, ptex-bin This seems to be bogus, because ptex-bin (source package of the three) has a versioned depends on tetex-bin that cannot be fullfilled with the version in sarge. But then: * Updating tetex-bin makes 35 non-depending packages uninstallable on alpha: acl2-infix, advi, cdcover, cjk-latex, dvidvi, dvifb, dvilib2, dvilib2-dev, dvilx, dvipdfm-cjk, dvipdfmx, dvipsk-ja, ipe, jtex-bin, latex2rtf, lgrind, libkpathsea-perl, lilypond, lprfax, multex-bin, musixtex, opustex, pdfjam, pmx, sgf2tex, sgmltexi, spawg, spawx11, tetex-bin, tex-guy, tex4ht, texmacs, therion, xdvik-ja, xgdvi What does that mean? For the first, acl2-infix, I cannot find any connection to tetex-bin; for cdcover, e.g., there is one: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3.3-1), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.3-1), tetex-bin, tetex-base, tetex-extra But how can that cause a problem? According to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=tetex-bin tetex-bin has been built "maybe-successful"ly on all arches. TIA, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
