Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > * Frank Küster [Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:55:56 +0200]: > >> * Updating tetex-bin makes 3 depending packages uninstallable on >> alpha: jbibtex-bin, jmpost, ptex-bin > > I think you need to ask -release for a hint of tetex-bin/2.0.2-20 and > ptex-bin/3.1.3+0.04a-3.
Thank you, I'll do that. >> But how can that cause a problem? According to >> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=tetex-bin >> tetex-bin has been built "maybe-successful"ly on all arches. > > it's not the case, but as you may know, "maybe-successful" does not > mean the package is in the archive for that arch. you want "Installed" > in <http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?package=tetex-bin>. Thanks very much, I didn't know that. By the way, the output is strange for tetex-base which is Architecture: all: http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php Which says that it is installed on amd64, with ,---- | amd64 | | main/tetex-base_2.0.2b-3: Installed by Frederik Schüler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [:] | Previous state was lost on 2004-08-26.16:23:30 `---- Besides that amd64 formally is not part of Debian yet, what does that indicate? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie