On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:03:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > There are no technical measures in place which *prohibit* developers from > sponsoring NMUs. Nevertheless, the concept of a sponsored NMU is a broken > one, because responsibility for the NMU lies with the uploader, not with the > sponsoree.
Does that mean that your opinion is that sponsored NMU's should be forbidden? I would regret that. It's not bad that someone in the NM queue also does NMU's to help fixing other packages. And I don't see a problem with responsability if the sponsor is aware of that responsability. But maybe I'm missing something? -- Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 30 May 2006 22:02:12 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
