On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:48:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > IMHO we really should have a global NMU blacklist (no, never per-package. > That way lies lameness) which we could ask the ctte to place maintainers in > for a few months when someone does the NMU-and-forget routine and that NMU > causes problems: screw up an NMU and don't clean up after yourself, get > punished by not being able to screw up through NMUs again for a while. > > We should *also* have the pts auto-add anyone who does an NMU to receive all > bug reports. If you NMU, you *are* responsible for it, and it is not nice > to make it so easy for one to forget he NMUed something, after all.
You sure do have a point here. But that seems to apply to both DD's and non-DD's. I still don't see why a sponsored NMU would be bad. -- Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 31 May 2006 07:20:01 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
