On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Sune Vuorela <s...@debian.org> wrote: > And in this specific case, the coinor build systems in general is so full of > weirdnesses that just adapting it in smaller bits is much more feasable than > adapting all of it. > > And given the different parts of coinor also have different release schedules > it > is also easier to provide the actual newest fixed bits with separate packages > rather than large combined packages. > > So from my experience, both with coinor and with other large source packages, > (KDE*, Qt*), separate sources is just the thing to do.
Thanks for sharing your experience with this. I agree that keeping the source packages separate is the better approach, especially given how different the release schedules are and how infrequently updated CoinAll is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJLyeTmcsFscOaVyE8TgG09bUZYoCYwQTcA=pc7qnox7qym...@mail.gmail.com
