On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:20:39AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > gdal is currently involved in the ongoing poppler transition. To > > not entangle the poppler and libepsilon transition, please talk to > > the Release Team and wait for their OK. (I don't know how many > > packages are involved in the libepsilon transition, but you might > > want to read [1] on how to coordinate transitions with the Release > > Team.) > > GDAL is already marked 'good' in the poppler transition, that doesn't > seem to be a problem. The openjpeg transition in which it's include > via poppler may be. > > Since only gdal and librasterlite need to be rebuild for the new > libepsilon skipping the release team was not protested. See: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/01/msg00054.html > > > But anyway, this upload is not required. Once the new libepsilon > > got built and installed everywhere,
libepsilon is just uploaded > > it is enough to request > > binNMUs. reportbug release.debian.org has a template for that. > > Andreas, should we go this route instead? Requesting binNMUs would do less stress test to my poor connection. :-) I'd also like to say that you are asking for sponsoring 1.1~svn11-3 in #736884 but Git has only 1.1g-3 which is just in experimental. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140128070327.gb9...@an3as.eu