On 01/28/2014 08:03 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:20:39AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> gdal is currently involved in the ongoing poppler transition. To >>> not entangle the poppler and libepsilon transition, please talk to >>> the Release Team and wait for their OK. (I don't know how many >>> packages are involved in the libepsilon transition, but you might >>> want to read [1] on how to coordinate transitions with the Release >>> Team.) >> >> GDAL is already marked 'good' in the poppler transition, that doesn't >> seem to be a problem. The openjpeg transition in which it's include >> via poppler may be. >> >> Since only gdal and librasterlite need to be rebuild for the new >> libepsilon skipping the release team was not protested. See: >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/01/msg00054.html >> >>> But anyway, this upload is not required. Once the new libepsilon >>> got built and installed everywhere, > > libepsilon is just uploaded
Thanks. >>> it is enough to request >>> binNMUs. reportbug release.debian.org has a template for that. >> >> Andreas, should we go this route instead? > > Requesting binNMUs would do less stress test to my poor connection. :-) > > I'd also like to say that you are asking for sponsoring 1.1~svn11-3 in > #736884 but Git has only 1.1g-3 which is just in experimental. Because master already has 1.1g, the changes for 1.1~svn-3 live in the 1.1_svn11 branch. But this won't be required anymore. Kind Regards, Bas -- GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52e757d6.6020...@xs4all.nl
