Thibaut Paumard schreef: > Le 17/03/2014 13:34, Albert van der Horst a écrit : >>> one version, 2.21 is GPL, but already for reasonable sized brain image >>> data the code crashes, and the way the code is written there is no easy >>> way to fix this, and hence, Oscar went with version 3.0, which works. >>> >>> However, version 3.0 comes with a license attached that only allows use >>> for research purposes and doesn't allow the redistribution of the >>> source >>> code. >> >> This seems to like a clear violation of the GPL. >> Just ask them to comply with the GPL. > > Not at all. They are upstream, they can change their own licensing terms > for new releases of their code. They are simply not yielding their new > work under the same terms as they did with their preceding work. The GPL > is *not* viral, using it for version 2.21 of your code does not force > you to use it for version 3.0.
Of course. I didn't realize it was just the same authors with a new version. How stupid. > > Kind regards, Thibaut. > > > -- Suffering is the prerogative of the strong, the weak -- perish. Albert van der Horst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/44ec07df5606382d214507d9a92cecf9.squir...@webmail.xs4all.nl
