Hi Gianfranco, > I sponsored the package
Thank you again for all your help. > (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is > nice to be subscribed) I have subscribed to debian-science as well. > However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags in a future > release: > CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE): > LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,now) > CFLAGS missing (-fPIE): > LDFLAGS missing (-fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,now) > you can see the full log here [1] or by using blhc tool > > > [1] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#unstable/polyml/5.5.2-1/blhc I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script requires gcc and libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have added those as dependencies for polyml. Should I push my changes to debian-science/packages/polyml.git (especially since that’s the repository in debian/control)? Also, going forwards, if I want to get a new version uploaded, do I need to file a new RFS “bug” against sponsorship-requests, or should I instead just email debian-science asking for a team upload (subject to a review of the package)? James
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
