Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > > After: > ,---- > | EMACSFLAGS = -L /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dash-el \ > | -L /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src/noflet-* > | test : > | $(EMACS) --no-site-file --no-site-lisp --batch \ > | $(EMACSFLAGS) \ > | -l test/run-tests > `---- > > Is this the best way to work around upstream's usage of Cask? >
It seems like a reasonable idea to me. Although I'm not really familiar with cask, if I understand correctly, it's mainly about providing a controlled test environment? This we can do via chroots. d
