Daniel James escribe: > I believe Musix now uses the 64 Studio kernel packages, so that's one > less variable ;-) Ubuntu Studio is not going for a Molnar-style RT > kernel, according to an interview with Cory Kontros I read.
That's not the case. Musix kernels are packaged by Tapani Raikkonen which by the way is doing a great job, Musix is delivered with the most recent kernels suitable to be patched for realtime work. > I believe it's because in the mainstream, audio on GNU/Linux has mostly > been addressed from the point of view of a so-called 'consumer'. So > distros have tried to solve questions like "How do I make my iPod work > out of the box, so I can re-arrange my collection of Britney Spears > downloads?" rather than "How do I tune my kernel and OS for maximum > performance when tracking 24 channels over my ADAT interface?" I agree with that. A system suitable for those who enjoy multimedia just for fun is very different than a system for those who use a system for multimedia creation. Indeed almost nobody really needs jackd to be installed unless she pretends to use ardour, zynaddsubfx or similar soft. So I think it's ok that Debian doesn't focus on multimedia creation given there are more suitable distros adapted from the Debian main one. Cordially, Ismael -- Ismael Valladolid Torres m. +34679156321 La media hostia j. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lamediahostia.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
