On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:46:45AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have the intention of providing ocamake as part of debian. Strange > > wording you would say, but the problem is that ocamake is right now only > > a simple .ml file and a .html doc. It would be kind of ridiculous to > > ship a package with just it in it, but to what other package could it be > > added. > > > > Ocaml-tools comes to mind, but Ralf has said that he considers > > multi-source packages problematic, and i am not maintaining it. > > > > What do you all think of this, do you think ocaml-tools could be one of > > the first packages handled in a cooperative way on the new project, and > > that various people could maintain sub-parts of it or something such ? > > It would still need a new release each time one of the packages is > > upgraded, but this could be done independently by each sub-maintainer ? > > > > Ralf, what do you think of it ? > > If ocamake is really small and arch-idependent then it should go into
It is just : -rw-r--r-- 1 luther luther 5660 2003-05-20 16:20 ocamake.html -rw-r--r-- 1 luther luther 21179 2003-05-20 16:20 ocamake.ml I suppose that building bytecode only would count as being arch-independent, right ? > ocaml-tools. I also agree to have it maintained by the ocaml cooperative :-) > I guess that this can wait until we have our subproject at alioth? Yes, there is no urgency. Friendly, Sven Luther
