Selon Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:58:58PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > > social contract says so. And anyway, we are the vanguard of ocaml > > > packaging, i guess others will follow suit if we do something :))) > > I think more and more of providing my own version of ocaml packages ... > > Jerome, Sven, please, don't be silly.
Hmm, I can discuss but I think I have no choice but accepting what's going to happen. Should I still give my view? > The thread between you two is (not so) slowly drifting away from the > original two pointed out problems. > > Please explain what kind of compatibility we are going to break having > as an invariant all symlinks pointing to the latest ocaml version. You must make sure symlinks are there which is not possible when they are provided by another package. > We can also provide hard link if some broken minded script is looking > for ocaml not being a symlink! :-) Hmm? -- Jérôme Marant
