Selon Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ok, nobody could force you to do work you wont like to do. But, assuming > that we will choose this not-yet-approved solution, is a problem for you > to name your binary packages including also the -<ocaml_version> part?
This is overkilling. Apart from this, I think it is confusing because users could interpret this as the lib version rather than the ocaml version. Usually in libfoo-x.y, x.y is the soname or the lib version. Something better must be envisaged. -- Jérôme Marant
