Hello, On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:04:15PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Question, do we want to go ahead and package this, including the full > > rebuild, > > or wait for ocaml 3.09 ? Do anyone have any information of the likeliness > > of a > > 3.09 release nextly ? I mean we where acustomed to a yearly new ocaml > > release > > each summer, but maybe with the point releases this is no more of actuality. > > I rather prefer to wait at least for ocaml 3.08.3-7 to enter testing (it > just need to be rebuilt on hppa and a 7 days of delay, up to glibc of > course ...). > > While we are at it I also think is the right moment to start changing > packages to use dh_ocaml (if noone objects of course). Since we will > need to rebuild a lot of packages it would be a good moment to make also > that change. > > The week delay will give us time to ask JoeyH to include dh_ocaml in the > next release of debhelper and have it ready. May I go for it and ask > JoeyH for the inclusion? Comments? >
I agree on waiting ocaml 3.08.3-7 to enter testing and then upload 3.08.4. Maybe i am wrong but i think it is best to keep dh_ocaml out of debhelper. I feel it should be better for made it evolve at will... Maybe it can become a real package ? Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
