On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Ok, I took it into account.
Wonderful, thanks. > The new (and hopefully definitive) request is at: > http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/binNMU.txt It looks sane to me. The only doubt I've is: you put dep-wait on +b1, in doing so you're assuming that +b1 is the result of the binNMU *we* are requesting, right? So, in theory, this can screw up if some other binNMU has been made for other reasons in the involved package. I don't think this is any serious problem, as the dep-wait will be added manually AFAIU, and the release managers can check whether they need to bump +b1 to +b2 or something such. Can please someone else have a look at the list?, just for the sake of redundancy ... This afternoon I will forward it as a binNMU request on -release. Many thanks again to Stéphane for the script! -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
