Julien Cristau a écrit : >> Note that all architectures are not listed for each package: I took >> archs where at least one binary package exists (or all if one >> arch-independant binary package exists). >> > arch-independant packages are not rebuilt by binary NMUs, so you should > ignore those packages in the script.
Is this correct? It doesn't seem to me: a package containing only .cmo/.cmi/.cma (ie. bytecode objects) and text files is arch-independant, isn't it? However, it does need to be rebuilt on binary NMUs... or maybe I am missing something? Expanding "all" to all architecture might be unnecessary, though: a "reference" architecture should be sufficient. Cheers, -- Stéphane