On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:58:04 +0200 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > [ please wrap your lines after 72 chars. I have to wrap them > here manually. This is intended to both of you... ] > > Aigars Mahinovs wrote: > > I don't uderstand shell scripts, but the postinst of > > uh? A DD not understanding shell scripts?
happends :)
> > openoffice.org-debian-files 1.0.99+1.1rc-3 didn't work for me
> > upgrading from 1.0.* packages directly.
>
> Hmm.
>
> > The directory /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict was not created and
> > the symlink ooo to /usr/lib/myspell/dicts was not created.
>
> You mean /usr/share/myspell/dicts?
Yes, sorry about that.
> > The fix is to:
> > # mkdir /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict
> > # cd /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict
> > # ln -s /usr/lib/myspell/dicts ooo
(misspelled here too, must be /usr/share/myspell/dicts)
> eh?
>
> This exactly is done in oo-d-f's postinst ad of -3..
>
> > ii openoffice.org-debian-fil 1.0.99+1.1rc-3 Debian specific parts
> > of OpenOffic
>
> ... which you have installed...
I know, this is where I took the commands from, which is the most
strangest thing here. It seems, that in some environment, this check
fails:
(/var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-debian-files.postinst)
if [ "$1" = "configure" ] && dpkg -l openoffice.org | grep ii
>/dev/null; then
The problem seens to be, that at the moment of configuration of
openoffice.org-debian-files, openoffice.org could be still in some other
state like half-configured or half-installed. Why is the dpkg/grep check
needed? Maybe it should be replaced with something more reliable?
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
| .''`. |
| : :' : Debian GNU/Linux & LAKA |
| `. `' http://www.debian.org http://www.laka.lv |
| `- |
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
pgp5yTNIVfAP9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
