On Tue, May 19, 1998 at 01:11:31PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I think my main problem with the `pro-strong-policy' arguments that > I've been seeing here is that they seem to imply an assumption that > policy is by definition correct, and that any point where it wasn't > the relevant policy document maintainer would agree at once.
This seems reasonable. If adopted, can we define policy to be binding rather than just recommendations/guidelines? I have real trouble with the idea of a policy which is non-binding (for Debian at least). Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
