Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>"Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris> It may be too late. We *NEED* consensus on this sort of thing: > No, we do not need a consensus. The DPL can still mandate a > solution by fiat, thank god. Man, your reading comprehension skills have gone to pot since you decided that this was all something to be furious about. I much prefer calm, reasoned debate. Especially when discussing technical issues. I hope we can both get on the same page one of these days, because I'm really tired of being misinterpreted and attacked for things I didn't say. I certainly hope the DPL has more sense that to listen to someone on the edge of hysteria about an issue. > Chris> Wonko is compliant with policy version 3.0.0.0; the [...] > Until the policy document come out (and it may be years before > that happens, the package is indeed in violation of policy. Bzzt, thanks for playing. 3.0.0.0 is policy today. -- Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | above, but it is too long to fit into http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.