>>"Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> What is a legitimate reason for uploading to stable/unstable other than Ben> convience? I see none.
Is there a reason for policy to disallow convenience (incidentally, what reason is there to use helper packages other than convenience? Ben> However, there are inherent problems with allowing Ben> stable/unstable uploads, which I have outlined. No, you have outlined problems in dinstall and the buildd process. There is inherently no reason not to have multiple versions of a package in the same distribution using package pools, apart from the current implementation of dinstall. There is not technical reason for not building uploads to stable unstable twice in buildd either. Ben> Because of that, and because there are no technical reasons Ben> otherwise, I feel that they should be disallowed, to prevent the Ben> problems. Fix the root of the problem. Making people do two uploads because of flaws in the process should not be enshrined in policy. manoj -- "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." Bernard Berenson Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C