Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070710 18:05]:
>> There is no technical reason why this has to be a makefile. I propose:
>
> What is the use case of the change? I already see enough "bad code"
> right now, and it would only get worse if people start to write their
> make file in lets say ruby.
While I agree with you that majority of people might do bad code I
also think that some very complicated packages (OO, X, Kernel and
like) can use it and make maintainers life easier.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
